Long-Term Occupational Projections (2020-2030)

Use this page to sort, search, filter, and export long term projections. To sort the data select the header of the column to sort. Data can be filtered by entering a specific state name, or occupational title. Use "Double Quotes" to search for an exact term. If the table below is empty when a particular state is entered, that state has not yet submitted projections. If a particular occupation does not show up this means there is no publicly available projection for that occupation in the area specified.

The data is also available via REST and Direct Download.

Additional information and resources are available on each State's website, and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics website. More information about occupational details can be found on the O*NET Online website.

About the Long Term Projections.

Enter one or more state names to filter results. Use quotes for multi-word states like "West Virginia"
Use Ctrl+click on Desktop to Select Multiple or De-Select
Area Title Sort descending Base Projected Change %Change Avg. Annl Openings
North Carolina Aerospace Engineers 600 700 100 16.7 50
Ohio Aerospace Engineers 3,620 3,900 280 7.7 240
Oklahoma Aerospace Engineers 1,670 1,820 150 9 110
Oregon Aerospace Engineers 140 170 30 21.4 10
Pennsylvania Aerospace Engineers 860 960 100 11.6 60
Puerto Rico Aerospace Engineers 180 210 30 16.7 10
Rhode Island Aerospace Engineers 20 20 0 0 0
South Carolina Aerospace Engineers 370 410 40 10.8 30
Tennessee Aerospace Engineers 390 460 70 17.9 30
Texas Aerospace Engineers 6,150 7,290 1,140 18.5 480
Utah Aerospace Engineers 670 940 270 40.3 70
Virginia Aerospace Engineers 2,020 2,190 170 8.4 130
Washington Aerospace Engineers 7,330 6,310 -1,020 -13.9 210
Wisconsin Aerospace Engineers 120 130 10 8.3 10
United States Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 18,700 27,300 8,600 46 3,400
Alabama Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 30 30 0 0 0
Arizona Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 150 210 60 40 30
California Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 9,100 11,800 2,700 29.7 1,400
Colorado Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 80 120 40 50 20
Connecticut Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 210 250 40 19 30
Idaho Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 10 10 0 0 0
Illinois Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 300 470 170 56.7 60
Indiana Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 230 300 70 30.4 40
Louisiana Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 60 80 20 33.3 10
Maryland Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 240 280 40 16.7 30
Massachusetts Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 150 290 140 93.3 40
Michigan Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 250 320 70 28 40
Minnesota Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 180 230 50 27.8 30
Nebraska Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 10 20 10 100 0
Nevada Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 290 410 120 41.4 50
New Jersey Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 130 200 70 53.8 30
New York Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 2,510 4,700 2,190 87.3 610
North Carolina Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 380 540 160 42.1 70
Ohio Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 90 110 20 22.2 10
South Carolina Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 80 110 30 37.5 10
Tennessee Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 2,750 3,620 870 31.6 430
Utah Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 40 50 10 25 10
Virginia Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 170 200 30 17.6 20
Washington Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 80 100 20 25 10
Wisconsin Agents and Business Managers of Artists, Performers, and Athletes 110 110 0 0 10
United States Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 26,600 28,700 2,100 7.9 3,700
Alabama Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 380 390 10 2.6 50
Arizona Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 320 360 40 12.5 50
Arkansas Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 520 560 40 7.7 70
California Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 4,400 4,800 400 9.1 630
Colorado Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 240 300 60 25 40
Connecticut Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 100 110 10 10 10
Delaware Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 70 70 0 0 10
Florida Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 690 770 80 11.6 100
Georgia Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 1,560 1,690 130 8.3 220
Hawaii Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 130 140 10 7.7 20
Idaho Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 400 450 50 12.5 50
Illinois Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 990 1,080 90 9.1 140
Indiana Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 580 640 60 10.3 80
Iowa Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 1,450 1,630 180 12.4 210
Kansas Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 540 590 50 9.3 80
Kentucky Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 370 390 20 5.4 50
Louisiana Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 260 260 0 0 30
Maine Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 40 40 0 0 10
Maryland Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 390 420 30 7.7 60
Massachusetts Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 160 210 50 31.3 30
Michigan Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 230 240 10 4.3 30
Minnesota Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 1,120 1,160 40 3.6 150
Mississippi Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 210 240 30 14.3 30
Missouri Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 640 750 110 17.2 100
Nebraska Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 1,200 1,290 90 7.5 170
Nevada Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 70 80 10 14.3 10
New Hampshire Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 20 20 0 0 0
New Jersey Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 510 540 30 5.9 70
New Mexico Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 130 150 20 15.4 20
New York Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 660 790 130 19.7 100
North Carolina Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 510 520 10 2 70
North Dakota Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 160 150 -10 -6.3 20
Ohio Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 530 560 30 5.7 70
Oklahoma Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 220 220 0 0 30
Oregon Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 1,140 1,350 210 18.4 160
Pennsylvania Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 980 1,050 70 7.1 140
Puerto Rico Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 300 340 40 13.3 40
South Carolina Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 140 150 10 7.1 20
South Dakota Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 600 700 100 16.7 90
Tennessee Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 550 610 60 10.9 80
Texas Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 1,460 1,730 270 18.5 230
Utah Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 220 280 60 27.3 40
Vermont Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 190 200 10 5.3 20
Virginia Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 480 510 30 6.3 70
Washington Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 440 500 60 13.6 70
Wisconsin Agricultural and Food Science Technicians (SOC 2018) 1,090 1,170 80 7.3 150
United States Agricultural Engineers 1,500 1,500 0 0 100
Florida Agricultural Engineers 50 60 10 20 0
Idaho Agricultural Engineers 10 10 0 0 0
Illinois Agricultural Engineers 70 70 0 0 10
Indiana Agricultural Engineers 50 50 0 0 0
Iowa Agricultural Engineers 280 300 20 7.1 20
Minnesota Agricultural Engineers 30 30 0 0 0
Nebraska Agricultural Engineers 40 40 0 0 0
New Jersey Agricultural Engineers 0 0 0 0 0
North Dakota Agricultural Engineers 10 10 0 0 0
Oregon Agricultural Engineers 10 10 0 0 0
Puerto Rico Agricultural Engineers 80 80 0 0 10
South Dakota Agricultural Engineers 70 70 0 0 10
This workforce product was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. The product was created by the recipient and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Labor. The U.S. Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on linked sites and including, but not limited to, accuracy of the information or its completeness, timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability, or ownership. This product is copyrighted by the institution that created it. Internal use by an organization and/or personal use by an individual for non-commercial purposes is permissible. All other uses require the prior authorization of the copyright owner.